logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2014.08.21 2014고단984
공용물건손상등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B-low driver vehicle in the range of driver vehicles in violation of the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act.

The Defendant stated in the written indictment on March 8, 2014 as “ March 8, 2013.” However, the Defendant appears to be a clerical error in the phrase “ March 8, 2014.” and did not affect the Defendant’s right of defense, and thus, ex officio correction is made, on the ground that the Defendant’

(hereinafter the same shall apply)

In 23:58, driving the said vehicle without a driver's license, and changing the vehicle line into two lanes in front of the Daesung Agricultural Cooperative, which is located in the northwest-ro 1 in Sinpo City, from the west-si basin to the brea Central Elementary School, the two-lanes of the breado has been driving along the two-lane.

At this point, the intersection where no signal, etc. is installed, and there are other vehicles in the same two-lanes of the same road, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely operating the front left well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this without a driver’s license, and neglected the vehicle line as it is, thereby changing the said road along the two-lanes of the same room, received the parts adjacent to the right side of the victim C (Nam, 49 years old) driving of the said road from the left side of the said franchise vehicle.

The Defendant, by occupational negligence, destroyed the above rocketing vehicle repair cost to be equivalent to KRW 855,864, and did not immediately stop and take necessary measures, such as making on-site reports, and escaped without taking necessary measures.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of the measurement of alcoholic beverages) provides reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking sniffing on March 9, 2014, by carrying a traffic accident at a wooden police box of the wooden Police Station located in E on March 9, 2014, and arrested him/her as a flagrant offender, as prescribed in paragraph (1), and driving the motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol from G to the police officer belonging to the said police box.

arrow