logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.11.23 2017나46653
물품대금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, KRW 19,203,50 against the Plaintiff and its related thereto, from March 18, 2016 to October 24, 2016.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The Plaintiff is a company that manufactures and processes industrial plastics, and the Defendant is a company that manufactures and sells industrial machinery.

B. (1) On October 14, 2015, the Defendant sent an e-mail requesting the Defendant to make an estimate of the “MCBR estimate drawings” attached to the Plaintiff. On October 20, 2015, the Plaintiff sent 875 MC processed goods to the Defendant (hereinafter “the primary goods”).

(2) On November 26, 2015, the Defendant sent to the Plaintiff a written order (Evidence A No. 2; hereinafter “instant order”) stating that the purchase price of the goods is KRW 16,418,500, in total, the purchase price of the goods was indicated as KRW 16,418,50.

C. On December 14, 2015, the Defendant sent an e-mail requesting emergency work regarding “Plastic Transfer Site Map” attached to the Plaintiff.

On December 15, 2015, the Plaintiff sent a written estimate to the Defendant stating the total amount of KRW 2,707,000 in total of 43 goods for MC processing (hereinafter “second goods”) and produced the second goods.

On December 16, 2015, the Defendant sent an e-mail sent to the Plaintiff an e-mail requesting work relating to the “PE and MF processing order drawings” attached to the 2th Ambsk-in shop work site.

On December 17, 2015, the Plaintiff sent a written estimate to the Defendant stating the total amount of 78,000 won of the total amount of the PE and MC processed goods (hereinafter “third goods”). The Plaintiff produced the third goods.

E. After the end of December 2015, the date of delivery of the goods 1, 2, and 3, the Defendant refused to receive the goods due to financial standing, and on March 17, 2016, this case is a part of our development equipment, which is currently being developed, and is in the process of determining whether it is possible to apply the equipment to the Plaintiff.

We examine the feasibility of development and application.

arrow