All appeals by the Defendants and the Prosecutor are dismissed.

1. As to the punishment (Defendant A: 2 years and 2 months of imprisonment, Defendant B: 1 year and 10 months of imprisonment) declared by the lower court, the Defendants asserted that it is too unreasonable for the Defendants to be too unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that it is too unfied and unfair for the Defendants to be too unfied.

2. There is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the original judgment because new sentencing data have not been submitted at the trial of the original judgment. In full view of all the reasons for sentencing presented by the lower court, the sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendants is within the scope of the sentencing discretion assigned to the lower court, and it cannot be deemed that the pertinent punishment is too heavy or too harsh and unfair.

Therefore, the defendants and the prosecutor's argument of sentencing is without merit.

3. According to the conclusion, all appeals filed by the Defendants and the prosecutor are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, as the grounds for appeal are without merit.