1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The plaintiff asserts that on January 4, 2010, the plaintiff lent KRW 35 million to the defendant on July 4, 2010 by setting the due date as July 4, 2010.

The defendant's unmanned machines next to the defendant's name with evidence Nos. 1 (k) are the defendant's unmanned machines, but there is no dispute between the parties. However, since the creditor's portion of evidence No. 1 delivered by the plaintiff No. C was blank and was recorded in the creditor's portion, it cannot be used as evidence unless there is any evidence to prove that the plaintiff was authorized to prepare the creditor's portion as above, and each statement of evidence Nos. 2 and 4 is insufficient to recognize the fact of lending the plaintiff's assertion, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.