1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B, as indicated in the attached Form No. 1,671 square meters of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D 1,671 square meters, indicated in the attached Form No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and

1.The following facts do not conflict between the Parties:

On January 200, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Defendant B, Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D (hereinafter “instant land”) on the lease deposit of KRW 20 million (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”), and delivered the instant land.

B. Defendant B newly constructed a household building consisting of a plastic roof (hereinafter “the instant household building”) on the ground 109.19mm2 at the place of the ship connected with each of the instant points in sequence, among the instant land, on the indication of the attached drawing, (2), (3), (4), and (1). Defendant C used the instant household building as a lodging place.

C. Meanwhile, Defendant B paid to the Plaintiff once a year that the instant land was charged to the Plaintiff at the end of each year, but did not pay a total of KRW 42 million until December 31, 2014, and did not pay KRW 15 million in rent in 2015.

Defendant B promised on March 6, 2015 to pay to the Plaintiff the full amount of KRW 57 million in the rent of KRW 42 million in arrears and KRW 15 million in the rent of year 2015 by June 30, 2015, and if Defendant B fails to comply with the said commitment, the same year shall apply.

6. By 30.30, landscaping trees on the instant land are transferred to the Plaintiff without compensation, and the instant building is demolished and delivered to the Plaintiff.

“To draw up the letter of commitment to the content.”

E. The Plaintiff expressed his/her intent to terminate the instant lease agreement by serving the instant complaint on the grounds of Defendant B’s failure to pay the rent as above, and the duplicate of the instant complaint reached Defendant B on December 15, 2015.

F. The Defendants currently occupy and use the instant land.

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, the instant lease contract was lawfully terminated on December 15, 2015 by the Plaintiff’s notice of termination on the ground that Defendant B had not been paid at least two months of rent. Thus, Defendant B’s objection to the land of this case is against the Plaintiff.