The judgment of the court of first instance, that of the judgment of the court of second instance, that of the judgment of the court of second instance, that of the judgment of the court of third.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal 1. The defendant A: imprisonment with prison labor of the first judgment of the court of first instance and imprisonment of the third judgment of the court of third instance; eight months; and

2. Defendant U: Imprisonment with prison labor of the second instance judgment; eight months; and

3. Defendant B: Imprisonment with prison labor of 6 months, 1 year and 6 months, and 8 months, of imprisonment with prison labor of 3 months and 4 months, are too unreasonable.

2. Prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal by the Defendants ex officio following the consolidation, the appeals cases against each of the judgment below were consolidated in the proceedings of the first instance court as follows. The offenses against the Defendants A and B are concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and shall be sentenced to a single sentence within the term of punishment increased by concurrent crimes pursuant to Article 38(1) of the Criminal Act. In this regard, the whole judgment of the first instance, the second judgment of the second instance, the part against the Defendant B, the third judgment of the third judgment, and the fourth judgment of the lower court, all of which are related to the Defendant B, shall not be exempted.

The judgment below

Section 1 of the Appellate Division A 2013No2269, U 2013No1667 VW X 2013No1667 of the first instance judgment on the relation of concurrent crimes committed by the Defendant joined the lower judgment, Section 3 of the 2013No1704 B 2013No1704 of the 201704 of the 3rd judgment on the actual provisions of the 4rd judgment B of the 2013No2075 of the 2013rd judgment

3. Although Defendant U’s U’s decision on the assertion of unfair sentencing regarding Defendant U’s assertion of unfair sentencing is recognized as having committed the instant crime, the said Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of injury at the Incheon District Court on May 31, 201 and again committed the instant crime during the repeated period after the execution of the said sentence was completed on September 28, 2011. The instant crime was committed by multiple participants and organized by setting the respective roles. Furthermore, the said Defendant agreed to undergo an investigation when it is controlled by the game operator and the police while comprehensively managing the instant game site. In light of the above criminal law, the nature of the relevant crime is not easy, and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and the instant case is committed.