logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.04.17 2015가합500755
집행문부여에 대한 이의의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. A. Around November 15, 2004, the Defendant leased the land indicated in paragraph (1) of the attached Table, which was jointly owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant land”) from November 15, 2004 to November 14, 2014, with the lease deposit of KRW 650,000,000, and the lease deposit of KRW 31,50,000 (value-added tax separate) from the rent of KRW 31,50,000 (value-added tax separate) to the Plaintiff.

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). B.

On July 4, 2005, Seoul Central District Court No. 2005No. 995 prepared a protocol of protocol prior to the filing of the lawsuit between the Plaintiff, a lessor of the instant lease agreement, C, the Defendant, and the lessee.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant protocol of conciliation”) the main contents of the protocol of conciliation in this case.

1. In the event that the Plaintiff did not pay the money stated in paragraph (2) from the hydro engineering, C, and the Defendant’s lease deposit amounting to KRW 650,000,000, the Plaintiff shall receive the deducted balance and remove the buildings listed in paragraph (2) of the attached Table No. 2 (hereinafter “instant building”) by November 14, 2014 and deliver the instant land.

2. The Plaintiff shall pay 31,50,000 won (excluding value-added tax) monthly rent to the Defendant from the date of completion of the settlement in this case to November 14, 2014 on the 15th day of each month.

3. The Plaintiff shall transfer, sublease, offer collateral, etc. the right to lease the land of this case to a third party, or shall obtain the consent of the parties, such as the extension or rebuilding of the building of this case, alteration of the purpose of use, and alteration of the purpose of use of the land of this case.

4. The Plaintiff loses the benefit of the time stipulated in Paragraph 1 and immediately remove the instant building and deliver the instant land even if the payment was in arrears two times or more from the date of the settlement of this case due to the monthly lease stipulated in Paragraph 2 and the cause stipulated in Paragraph 3 arose, if the consent was not obtained from the Defendant.

5...

arrow