Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. From July 1, 2002 to June 30, 2010, the Defendant was in charge of the duties of the president of the C&C association. The Defendant, who was the chief director of the said C&C association, was the Defendant, the Defendant, who was the chief director of the said C&C association, as the title “The Victim E, who was the publisher and editor of the D&D newspaper, confirms the responsibility for discontinuance of the F&C and the truth” in the said newspaper on April 29, 2009.

When publishing an article to the purport that "the above newspaper is "," the newspaper should not be published in the above newspaper by exercising pressure against C, community credit cooperatives, G companies, etc., which are published in the above newspaper, and thus, the above newspaper company's revenue was prevented by blocking the above newspaper company's advertising expenses. As such, around May 18, 2009, the defendant, at the above union office located in Busan Metropolitan Government He, proposed an emergency agreement to prevent the above community credit cooperatives' union's members from publishing the advertisement in the D newspaper, which was proposed to prohibit the above community credit cooperatives or association's members from publishing the advertisement in the D newspaper, and subsequently, a decision was made to prohibit the direction and refer the union's disciplinary action to the union's disciplinary action.

The public question was sent in the name of the chief executive officer of the union, which contains the content of the "."

However, the above community credit cooperatives become a separate juristic person, but for executive officers of community credit cooperatives, the above union should be qualified as a member of the union, and when a member is deprived of the member's qualification, the status of executive officers of community credit cooperatives should also be deprived of the above union, and the above recommendation cannot be complied with under the influence of the union.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s operation of the newspaper company and the publication of the newspaper by force above.

B. The Defendant also has the same place around that time, and the said GG company representative director.