Cases
2017Done 9417 Divorce
Plaintiff
A (1960s)
Address
Place of service
Reference domicile
Attorney Park Jae-hoon
Subagent of lawsuit
Defendant
B. (1955. South and North Korea)
Busan Address
Busan District Court
Conclusion of Pleadings
November 30, 2017
Imposition of Judgment
December 21, 2017
Text
1. The plaintiff and the defendant are divorced.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.
Purport of claim
The order is as set forth in the text.
Reasons
In light of the overall purport of arguments in Gap evidence 1 through 7 (including numbers) and each recording of Gap evidence 8-1 through 10, the plaintiff and the defendant showed the whole purport of arguments. * On January 1, 1986, the plaintiff and the defendant are married with two adult children under slurries according to the law which has completed the marriage report * on several occasions during the marriage period without sufficient prior consultation with the plaintiff. The defendant has failed to perform various projects during the marriage period, but has failed to perform the business and suffered conflict with the plaintiff. In the process of running other businesses again, the defendant demanded a paper plaintiff to borrow a loan or loan funds from the plaintiff, and if the plaintiff did not take such a demand, it can be acknowledged that the plaintiff used verbal language and abusive language and abusive language to the plaintiff, and the plaintiff had experienced many economic difficulties due to a judicial settlement, such as the defendant's obligation to pay back the defendant's business failure, and the defendant's reply to the above claim for divorce cannot be seen to the extent that the above defendant's failure was not recovered.
Therefore, the plaintiff and the defendant are divorced.
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim for divorce shall be accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and it is so decided as per Disposition.
Judges
Judges Park Sang-sung