logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2017.07.19 2017고단539
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 10, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a D Kakn-kn-kicking Vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license within approximately 20km section from the Cheongk-kak Heavy Industries Road located in 1048, Northwest-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do; and (b) from the 1048 Northwest-do, Changwon-gu, Changwon-si to the front road.

2. On May 10, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was parked on the street while driving a DNA car with alcohol while drinking alcohol on the front side of the member city in Changwon-si, a member city in Changwon-si; (b) the Defendant was parked on the street.

E1 ton of cargo vehicles parked at the same place after being parked and returned home, the defendant voluntarily accompanied the vehicle to the G department office of the Msan-dong Police Station located in Msan-si, Masan-si, Masan-si, 17-ro, Masan-si, Masan-si, Masan-si, Masan-si, 17-ro, 56.

On May 10, 2017, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking, in the office of a guidance office in the Masan-dong Police Station G of the Masan-dong Police Station on May 10, 2017, in which the Defendant, from the slope H belonging to the said police station, was influencing, influencing,

There are reasonable grounds for recognition, and it was demanded to respond to the drinking measurement by inserting a total of about 40 minutes into a drinking measuring instrument four times.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not drive a vehicle in Korea.

Madern with mind.

B. The police officer did not comply with a police officer’s request for alcohol measurement without any justifiable reason, while avoiding this request, while being aware of the Manmana. Scar. Scar.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of I and J;

1. The investigation report on the actual condition of the traffic accident, the statement report on the circumstances of the driver with the main driver, and relevant photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the driving license ledger (A);

1. Article 148-2 (1) 2 and Article 44-2 (2) of the Road Traffic Act (the act of refusing to measure drinking), Article 152 subparagraph 1 of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts, the applicable law, the selective punishment, and Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 of the Road Traffic Act;

arrow