The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight years.

The defendant's 40-hour child abuse.

1. As to the summary of the grounds for appeal (a two-year imprisonment) by the court below, the defendant asserts that the defendant is too unfasible, and that the prosecutor is too unfasible and unfair.

2. The judgment recognizes all of the crimes of this case by the defendant, in particular, the fact that the defendant is responsible for the death of the victim D while living in custody and reflects the victim D, the defendant has no record of criminal punishment prior to the instant case, the bereaved families of the victim D and the victim I do not want the punishment of the defendant by mutual consent with the defendant, and the fact that the defendant is two married children living in custody, etc. are favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, each of the crimes of this case committed a physical and emotional abuse and injury against the victims who were danced by the defendant. In particular, the defendant forced the victims D to repeatedly commit tampal and dynamic acts which are hard to obtain, and also caused the death of the above victims as physical advisers such as the criminal facts stated in the judgment of the court below. Furthermore, in light of the circumstances, details, results, etc. of each crime, the crime was very serious, and in particular, the victim D, who was a blue of the defendant's physical adviser, had a short life with the age of 19 years. Even though the defendant did not intend the death of the above victim, since the defendant's flue act did not want the death of the above victim, the defendant's fluoral and fluoral behavior which could not change what he did not go against properly, caused the defendant's fluoral and fluoral behavior, which caused the death of the victim, and the victim's fluoral and fluoral behavior of the defendant from 200 years.