logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2014.06.27 2014고단483
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 14, 2014, at around 08:08, the Defendant driven a B Poter Cargo and proceeded in the same way as a road in front of the “Dcafeteria” located in Seopopo City, Seopopo City, along with a one-lane road. The Defendant was installed at the front door of the front door of the road, and thus, the Defendant neglected his duty of care to check whether there is a pedestrian, to prevent the accident, and thereby, caused the Defendant’s injury, such as blood transfusion, etc., by neglecting his/her duty of care to check whether there is a pedestrian, and by neglecting his/her duty of care to prevent the accident.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The application of photographs, such as on-site and accident vehicles, vehicle reports (on-site investigation report), and medical certificates to statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Selection of Punishment: Article 3 (1) and the proviso of Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents,

1. Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Provisional payment order: The punishment is determined as per the Disposition in consideration of all the following circumstances as the reasons for sentencing in Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act: The fact of crime is recognized; the fact of crime is agreed with the injured party; circumstances unfavorable to the injured party: Violation of duty of care; age of the injured party; degree of injury to the injured party; etc.; and other facts that are not good for the accused (in the crosswalk, the injured party suffers from injury due to shock of the children at the crosswalk). It is decided as per the Disposition on the grounds of accident circumstances (in the face of 35 pages of investigation record); circumstances after the commission of crime; and occupation of the accused.

arrow