A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 28, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on October 5, 2014, for the violation of the Road Traffic Act, in the Changwon District Court's Msan Branch, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 5, 2014.

1. The Defendant is the vice president of C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”) who is engaged in steel framed operations, and D is an individual entrepreneur who has engaged in metal processing business with the trade name “E”.

D has started the above business with the help of the defendant, but the business has been poor, and among October 2013, the defendant requested the defendant to handle the affairs necessary for the reorganization of the business and put his seal on his request.

When the Defendant received a subcontract for the date of manufacturing a temporary bridge ordered by the Construction of a Steel Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”) on the condition that he/she directly procures all materials from C from F, the Defendant intended to purchase materials from G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”), which is a steel materials supplier, but concluded a contract for supplying materials with G in the name of “E” for raising steel materials necessary for the construction of the said provisional bridge on the ground that there was an outstanding amount in relation to C from G.

On November 16, 2013, the Defendant entered into a contract with the vice president of H in Gyeong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, G to supply steel materials from G, and entered into a contract with the representative director of G as “10,000,000 won” in the supply value column of “goods supply basic contract” presented by G, and “D’s representative director D” in the column indicating the buyer, the Defendant posted D’s seal attached to D’s name.

For the purpose of uttering as above, the Defendant forged a basic contract for the supply of goods in the name of D, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. At the time and place specified in paragraph (1) above, the Defendant in the event of the above-mentioned investigation document shall enter into a basic contract for supply of forged goods to I by G representative director who is aware of the forgery.