Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Clearning car.

On June 30, 2017, the Defendant driven the upper vehicle around 18:30 on June 30, 2017, and led to the two new gates of the road in front of the restaurant in Gwangju Northern-gu D to the two new gates.

There are many vehicles parked in both sides, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to properly see the left, the right, and the front and rear, and to accurately manipulate the steering and brakes so as to prevent accidents from occurring.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected his duty of care and neglected to do so, thereby opening the door from the right side of the Defendant’s proceeding direction to the victim F(64) who opened and emitted from the vehicle, and received the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle from the right side.

As a result, the Defendant got about two weeks from the above occupational negligence to the right side in need of treatment, and immediately stopped and escaped without taking relief measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the F;

1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. An accident scene photograph;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (in relation to the attachment of CCTV images for crime prevention);

1. Article 5-3 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (this Act takes into consideration the following favorable circumstances: (i) the time to commit a crime in this Act; (ii) the vehicle of the Defendant’s driver is covered by a comprehensive insurance; (iii) the payment of insurance proceeds to the Defendant’s driver is deemed to have been made; and (iv) the payment of insurance proceeds to the class V higher than the hearing disability; and (iv) the first offender who has no criminal history is considered as a favorable condition;