A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a victim D ( South Korea, 22 tax) and a university line and a follow-up relationship.

On March 16, 2015, around 20:0, the Defendant her 20:0, around the second floor F of the building E in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, her drinking alcohol to the victim on the ground that he was a university’s ship, and her drinking alcohol to the victim on the ground that he was a fluent brin, fluent brin, fluor, and fluent brin, and fluent brin. The Defendant her drinking out the victim on the ground that he was a university’s ship.

The Defendant, with left hand, killed the victim’s face left side by drinking on several occasions, and inflicted injury on the victim’s unexploded flaps, such as an unexponed flash, an unexponed flash, an unexponed flash, and an flashed flash on the flash.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to D;

1. Complaint;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to evidential materials;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order [content of the assertion] However, the injury of blood transfusion, etc. is not caused by the Defendant’s assault, and thus, the crime of injury cannot be acknowledged.

[Judgment] The defendant also recognized that the victim intending to avoid such act had a seat of the body in the course of drinking the victim's left side of the body, and the defendant correctly prices the body of the body of the body of the victim.

On March 18, 2015, the diagnosis name of the diagnosis certificate issued by the victim at the victim's request on March 18, 2015, after the use framework, the Defendant also recognized that the victim had taken emergency measures to flow out from the part above the victim's end. The diagnosis name of the diagnosis certificate was written without mentioning the blood transfusion on the part of the victim, and only the string-out transfusion, and the fact that the victim was assaulted, the next day of the victim's assault was left at the dormitory for treatment.