A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

On May 3, 2015, at around 02:18, the Defendant: (a) received a report of assault on the way ahead of the main points of “D” located in Seo-gu, Busan; and (b) sent to F, a policeman belonging to the Busan Western Police Station E District, who was called for, “I can do so if I have to do so, I can do so.”

Therefore, when the victim was arrested and punished as a flagrant offender due to the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, the defendant saw the victim's vessel on his own scam, scambrow on the left side, scambrow on one occasion, and assaulted the head bond.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the above police officer’s 112 report processing and legitimate execution of duties regarding the arrest of flagrant offender, and at the same time, inflicted injury on the victim, such as “the pipes and tensions of the parts of the 112th report processing and the unknown wood and tension” where the victim’s treatment days cannot be known.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to G, F, and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police officers' photographs and opinions on damage;

1. Articles 136 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. It is necessary to strictly punish the defendant due to the extremely poor nature of the crime of this case that interferes with the performance of official duties due to the discovery of police officers and assaulting them by drinking, etc., who were called out after receiving a report on the reason of sentencing the sentence of imprisonment with prison labor on the choice of the punishment.

However, the degree of injury is minor, there is no record of punishment for obstruction of performance of official duties, and there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine for the same crime for the last 15 years, depth is reflected, and the motive and background of the crime in this case, the age of the defendant, character and conduct, environment, etc. shall be determined in comprehensive consideration.