logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원남원지원순창군법원 2015.12.18 2015가단29
청구이의
Text

1. The defendant's judgment of Jeonju District Court for the plaintiff 202Gaon287 delivered on September 10, 2002

Reasons

1. The following facts are acknowledged according to the records of this case and the purport of the entire pleadings.

A. On September 10, 2002, the Korea Saemaeul Community Fund (the merger into the Korea Saemaeul Community Fund at the end of December 2002) received a recommendation of execution from the Jeonju District Court in the Seoul District Court case of 2002Gau287, the Seoul District Court of the Southern Branch of the Seoul District Court of the Republic of Korea against C, D, and E, that “C, D, and E jointly and severally pay 6,259,250 won and 4,500,000 won with 18% interest per annum from September 3, 2002 to the date of full payment,” and the said recommendation of execution became final and conclusive around that time.

(D) On the other hand, the reason for the occurrence of the claim for the decision of performance recommendation is that "D and E jointly and severally guaranteed the loans of KRW 4,500,000 to Da on April 27, 2000 and D and E were extended on April 27, 200.

(2) On September 10, 2002, "D, E, and C shall jointly and severally pay 6,259,250 won to the D, E, and C, and 4,500,000 won a year from September 3, 2002 to the day of full payment." The execution recommendation decision became final and conclusive around that time (as to D, as to September 26, 2002), and on September 26, 2002, the causes of the above performance recommendation decision became final and conclusive. Meanwhile, on September 10, 2002, "D, E, and C shall jointly and severally pay 6,50,000 won to the D, E, and C, and 4,500 won a year from September 3, 202 to the day of full payment."

“The decision on performance recommendation” (hereinafter “2002 Ghana 288”) is the same (hereinafter “the decision on performance recommendation”), and the Plaintiff seeks non-performance of compulsory execution in separate cases.

Around August 3, 2012, the Defendant acquired a claim based on the decision of performance recommendation from the Seocho Saemaeul Community Fund. D.

D The plaintiff died on April 7, 2005, and the plaintiff is a father of D.

(2/15 of the shares in inheritance); 2. Sales

(a) a decision on recommendations for performance;

arrow