logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 거창지원 2016.01.20 2015고단94
사기
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On March 2008, the Defendant said that “The victim E was under construction of a new complex building in the Daejeon Pungdong-gu in the company, and the cost incurred for the electrical construction at the construction site is changed.” The Defendant said that “The cost incurred for the construction of a new complex building is changed.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay electrical construction among the construction works of a building with a flexible state, and even if he received money from the injured party, he did not think of it for the use related to the construction works, and only intended to use it for the purpose of personal living expenses or repayment of debts.

Ultimately, the Defendant, as seen above, received a total of KRW 11.5 million from April 8, 2008 to October 17, 2008, a sum of nine times, as shown in the List of Crimes, from the victim to the victim, by deceiving him/her as above.

B. On August 2008, the Defendant of KRW 20 million stated that “The Defendant, at the office of Taejin major Co., Ltd. located in the Busan Eastdong-dong-gu, Busan, the victim E, as if he had done electrical construction work at the construction site of the building site of the building site of the building site on a flexible state as stated in the foregoing paragraph A, the Defendant said that “The above construction fund is necessary, but the Defendant borrowed the two promissory notes of KRW 20 million at face value and KRW 30 million at face value to the victim, 50 million at face value.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay for electrical construction among the new construction works of a complex building on a flexible state, and the said bill was in default, even if the Defendant received money from the injured party, it was thought that he would use the money as the Defendant’s living cost, etc., and did not think that he would use it as the construction fund. Even if he received money from the injured party, the Defendant did not have the intent

Ultimately, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and is about 20 million won from the victim.

arrow