1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff the amount of KRW 39,025,497 and KRW 37,978,366 from May 1, 2015 to the date of full payment.

1. In full view of the purport of the argument in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 5 as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff agreed to receive the overdue lease fee and the separate early termination fee if the lease contract is terminated before the expiration of the lease contract (hereinafter "the lease contract in this case"), and the fact that the lease contract in this case was terminated at the request of the non-party company after the termination of the lease contract in the event that the principal of the lease contract in this case under the lease contract in this case was 36,362,08 won, 100 won, 36 months, 36 months, 24% per annum, 24% per annum, and 34% per annum. The fact that the lease contract in this case was terminated at the request of the non-party company, and that the principal of the lease in this case as of March 20, 2015 is 36,362,108 won, 15,3714, 3015 won, 47

Therefore, according to the above facts of recognition, the defendant, who is a joint guarantor of the non-party company, is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 39,025,497 won in total and 37,978,366 won (i.e., interest of the leased principal of KRW 36,362,082 won, KRW 1,575,384 won, KRW 40,900), the agreed interest rate of KRW 24% per annum from May 1, 2015 to the date of full payment.

2. As to the judgment on the defendant's assertion, the defendant asserted that the defendant as the representative director of the non-party company was jointly and severally guaranteed for the lease contract of this case, or that on April 16, 2015, the above representative director resigned from the above representative director and transferred C all the obligations under the lease contract of this case. However, since there is no evidence to acknowledge this, the above argument

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.