1. The instant lawsuit was concluded on October 7, 2016 as deemed to have been withdrawn.

2. The costs of the lawsuit after the completion of the lawsuit.

According to Article 268(1) and (2) of the Civil Procedure Act, both parties did not attend or attended twice.

Even if a pleading has not been made, an application for designation of date shall be filed within one month, and if an application for designation of date has not been filed within one month, the lawsuit shall be deemed to have been withdrawn.

The plaintiff was absent on the fourth date of pleading 16:00 of March 31, 2016 and the seventh date of pleading 10:10 of September 6, 2016, even when the plaintiff received the notice of legitimate date from this court. The defendants were all on the fourth date of pleading 10 of September 6, 2016, and on the seventh date of pleading 2016, the defendants were present at each of the defendant A, but did not present an argument. The fact that the plaintiff applied for the designation of date on December 21, 2016, much more than one month from the seventh date of pleading 201, is obvious in the record.

Thus, the lawsuit in this case is deemed to have been withdrawn on October 7, 2016 when one month has elapsed from the date when the plaintiff neglected the date twice (the seventh date for pleading) (the plaintiff's application for designation of date as of December 21, 2016 was made one month after the seventh date for pleading, and it is not effective as it was made one month after the seventh date for pleading, and one month, the period for filing the application for designation of date under Article 268 (2) of the Civil Procedure Act, is not the peremptory period, and thus, it is not allowed to complete the subsequent completion of the application for designation of date under Article 173 (1) of the Civil Procedure Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Order 92Ma175, Apr. 21, 1992). It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.