A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is an operator of the E Co., Ltd. that manufactures water supply and sewerage pipes and water supply pipes in Kimpo-siD, and F is a representative of Kimpo-si G Victim H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim Co., Ltd.”) located in Kimpo-si, and supplies the Defendant with a V and width.

1. On December 2016, 2016, the Defendant visited the victim company’s office, and called, “The Defendant visited the victim company’s office and supplied the employees I to E, who are in the place of business, with a fV and width, and supplied the goods by using the said fV and width, to the Seoul Procurement Service, and pay the price by the end of the following month (round the end of January 2017).”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to preferentially pay the price of goods to the victim company even if he receives the price of goods from the Seoul Public Procurement Service because the liabilities and loans of the 4 billion won amount of commercial transactions are accumulated at the time.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the above I, received 8,985,900 won at a market price from the victim company, and acquired 9 items, such as STS304, such as STS304, frith V.

2. On April 2017, the Defendant called the first executive director of the Victim Company to the first executive director of the Defendant Company, and supplied the Defendant to the Seoul Procurement Service additionally on April 2017.

The price will be paid by May 10, 2017, the outstanding amount of 8,985,900 won supplied around December 2016 will also be paid by May 20, 2017.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the Defendant was at the risk of business closure due to the excess of the obligation as referred to in the preceding paragraph, and around 60 million won of national taxes are in arrears and thus, was well aware of the fact that the supply price was not received from the Public Procurement Service, and there was no intention or ability to pay the price for the goods to the victim company even if the parts are supplied from

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the above I, has a total of 21,491,723 costs, such as STS304 V from the injured party.