logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.01.15 2014나33533
손해배상(기) 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part of the basic facts is that the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that for the corresponding part of the reasoning for the judgment, and thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence

2. Determination

A. The plaintiff's assertion (1) (1) 1, when the defendant solicits the plaintiff to make an investment in the game machine business, the defendant has already suffered losses due to the actual performance of the game machine business, and even though it was well known that the existing investors have been requesting the return of investment money, the defendant has a duty to compensate the plaintiff for losses incurred by investing in the game machine business in 27,00,000,000 won which was deducted by the plaintiff's share of 50% from the loss incurred by the plaintiff's investment in the game machine business due to tort, and then, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff the remainder of 13,50,000,000 won which was deducted by the share of 50% from the share of the plaintiff's loss incurred by the plaintiff's investment in the game machine business.

(2) Second, even if the defendant's liability for damages is not recognized, the defendant is obligated to pay 13,500,000 won to the plaintiff and its delay damages, since the plaintiff agreed to continue to make an investment at the time of making an investment in the game machine business and thereafter return the plaintiff's investment money.

B. (1) First, as to the first argument, it is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant had made a false statement as alleged above even though it is aware that the Defendant had been aware that the Plaintiff had a poor performance of the game machine business, and that the existing investors have requested the return of the investment money, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise, it is necessary to further examine the remainder of the argument.

arrow