Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B-wing truck with one ton of freight;

around 05:55 on October 27, 2018, the Defendant 127 as the school secretary of the petition-gu, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and the crosswalk 127 as the bottom of the Heung-gu, Cheongduk-gu, C from the direction, was straightly driven at a speed below the speed of the speed, using the 3rd line of the Dung-do, Dop, Dop-do

The point at which the accident occurred is equipped with a signal apparatus and crosswalk, so there was a duty of care to be done safely in accordance with the signals;

Nevertheless, due to negligence in violation of the red signals of the front signal apparatus, the victim was placed above the crosswalk by shocking the right side of the victim E (75 years old, female) who was crossing in the situation where the pedestrian signal was changed from the left side of the vehicle in front to the new signal, and the pedestrian signal was changed to the upper side of the road in front of the center line, and the pedestrian signal was changed to the red signal, and the front side of the victim E (75 years old, female) who was crossing.

Ultimately, due to the above occupational negligence, the victim suffered injury, such as a flag in the upper right flag, which requires 10 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A photograph by cutting a CCTV in an accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. An unfavorable circumstance such as the recognition of the crime of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act and the wrong and contradictoryness of the sentencing, the agreement with the victim, the fault and damage of the defendant, etc., such as the fact that a piracy vehicle has subscribed to a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, the fact that there is a higher criminal history, and other unfavorable circumstances such as the age, character and conduct of the defendant, the circumstances after the crime, and the health conditions of the defendant.