A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a set of motor vehicles under the E-Ra in violation of the Road Traffic Act (not after the accident).

On October 02, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car at around 23:15, while driving the said car, and driving the G Sari or the road of three-lanes in the vicinity of Kimhae-si F from G Sarina to the Bupyeong-ri distance. The Defendant discovered police officers under the influence of alcohol driving, and led to a serious challenge in order to avoid the crackdown on drinking.

At the time, the defendant's vehicle behind the driver's vehicle was stopped by the H. In such a case, the person engaged in the driver's duty of care to take care of the rear side and prevent the accident in advance by accurately manipulating the steering and brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so and thereby received the part of the Defendant’s Ra Ra Ra and the part of the Defendant’s Hah Hah-Wh-Wh-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-Woo

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence as seen above, destroyed the car at an amount equivalent to KRW 1,237,982, such as the exchange of the front driver, and did not immediately stop and check the degree of damage, and escaped.

2. The Defendant’s interference with the performance of special official duties, as described in paragraph 1, tried to drive the Defendant’s car in order to escape from drinking control, and the Victim K (21) who was the superior police officer of the Korean National Police Agency in the Gyeongnam Regional Police Agency, found it and prevented the Defendant from driving the Defendant’s car so that the Defendant could not escape.

Nevertheless, the Defendant proceeded with the above car, which is a dangerous object, as it is, and tried to escape from the victim's arms due to the victim's regular discipline on the front side of the above car, and the victim's regular discipline on the front side of the above car.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the crackdown on drinking of the victim.

(i) the evidence;