The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. On December 2, 2016, the Defendant damaged the property equivalent to KRW 100,540,000 in the estimation of repair cost, such as the vehicle from the right side of the damaged vehicle, on the street in front of the “D cafeteria” located in Switzerland-si, Chuncheon-si, on the ground that the victim E (20 3, South Korea) parked a vehicle of FIstren, which is the damaged vehicle, for a long time and brought about hindrance to its business.

2. According to the Defendant’s legal statement, even though the Defendant appears to walk the damaged vehicle, the prosecutor submitted a statement to the investigative agency of the victim, a written estimate of the damaged vehicle, and a photograph of the damaged vehicle as evidence to prove whether the damaged vehicle was damaged, but G, which prepared a written estimate for the damaged vehicle at the time, prepared a written estimate for the damaged vehicle, such as the above photograph, was only written a written estimate for the damaged part as to the damaged vehicle. There was no part in the damaged vehicle at the time, and there was no part in the damaged vehicle. The damaged part of the damaged part appears to have been damaged by a car, not to have been caused by a car, but to have been damaged by a car, and it is difficult to find that the damaged part of the damaged part was damaged by a vehicle as stated in this court’s evidence, in full view of the fact that there was no evidence that each of the above facts charged were damaged by each of the Defendant’s act.

Therefore, the facts charged of this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, the judgment of the court below is delivered with the decision of not guilty by the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.