1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part of the lawsuit seeking revocation of the imposition of charges for compelling compliance shall be dismissed.

2...

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion (1) A public official F in charge of the building house E-gu in Daegu Metropolitan City, and G, without permission, did not have extended the building located in Daegu Metropolitan City H (hereinafter “instant building”) owned by the Plaintiff, but did not properly verify the actual site and did not request the Plaintiff to voluntarily remove the instant building without permission, and if the Plaintiff had abused public authority to extend the building without permission, thereby threatening the Plaintiff by imposing a charge for compelling compliance.

In response to the above erroneous judgment of the above public officials, the petitioner stated that the building of this case was removed as an illegal building. Accordingly, the plaintiff was hindered in leasing the building of this case.

(2) In addition, the head of the Daegu E-gu E-gu Seoul Metropolitan City is responsible for direction and supervision over F and G, who is a public official in charge, but did not properly confirm the complaints filed by the Plaintiff against the mistake of the public official in charge as above.

(3) The J of the Daegu Metropolitan City City City Council as the K Team Team, had a professional high-class manpower with respect to the Plaintiff’s petition for Lone Audit, but did not properly conduct an audit.

(4) The Plaintiff suffered not only property damage due to the aforementioned tort committed by public officials in charge of public officials in F, G, the head of Gu of Daegu Metropolitan City, I, and J of Daegu Metropolitan City City City Council, but also health (in particular, with stress) and mental suffering.

F and G damages for property due to the illegal acts are KRW 10,00,000 for each of them, KRW 5,000 for consolation money, KRW 5,000 for each of them, KRW 5,000 for property damages due to one’s illegal acts, KRW 5,000 for consolation money, KRW 5,000 for property damages due to one’s illegal acts, and KRW 5,000 for consolation money, KRW 5,000 for property damages due to the J’s illegal acts, and KRW 5,00 for consolation money.

Therefore, the Plaintiff.