Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is both the couple B and the legal couple, and all of them are in the position of the D church as a pastor of the D church located in the Heung-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Goju-gu.

At around 19:00 on January 27, 2019, the Defendant, together with B, had a big dispute with this Chapter as the day in which the immediately preceding apartment and apartment shops were located, and had reached the residence of the victim in the Heung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C apartment G in order to comply with the dissatisfaction he had a usual objection against the said representative E (the age of 76).

The defendant, in collusion with B, got the beginning of the above victim's residence, followed the victim's "Isk-to-be, a motor vehicle waiting for a locked," and tried to enter the front door and the front door, and the victim, who was living together with B, had uneasy "Is to go out of her," and entered the victim's house against the victim's will while "Is to go out of her," and "Is to do so."

The Defendant and B were seated in her house and talked with the victim that she was fly fluent with her at the church, and her fluent with her at the time of worship. The Defendant and B her fluentd without permission in the victim's residence, such as her age, and her fluent with the victim's house, and her fluentd with the victim's house for 10 to 30 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. Statement E in the suspect examination protocol of the prosecution;

1. The defendant's written statement of the police and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant was good between E and entered the house with the consent of E at the time of the instant case, but E stated the content of the instant damage in the police and prosecutor's investigation process, and its contents are natural and specific, and thus, credibility is recognized.

Witness

Even based on the H’s statement, “I told the Defendant at the time of the instant case that I was satisfying, and was aware that the victim and the Defendant were not good at the time of the instant case,” and neighboring residents E also.