Defendant

A shall be punished by fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,00, and by fine of KRW 1,500,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are disqualified as licensed administrative agents.

1. On April 3, 201, the Defendants, despite the absence of a qualification as an administrative agent, provided that, on April 3, 2011, the Korea-U.S.-U. would provide consultation related to the status of stay to China, and introduced D that could receive employment visa, received KRW 50,000 per month between six months, and received KRW 1,50,000 in return for preparing and submitting documents related to the non-self-acquisition of the Korea-U.S. which completed the educational institute. From April 3, 2011 to February 29, 2012, the Defendants prepared and submitted the documents necessary for the counseling related to the status of stay, introduction of private teaching institutes, and obtaining status of stay in the attached Table (2) from April 3, 2011 to February 29, 2012.

Accordingly, even if the Defendants were not a licensed administrative agent in collusion, they provided consultation on administration, and provided services such as preparing documents and submitting documents by proxy to an administrative agency.

2. On May 31, 2011, the Defendant introduced, without the qualification as an administrative agent, a F to receive counseling and employment visa related to the status of stay from China E on May 31, 201, and received KRW 1.50,000 in return for preparing and submitting documents related to visa acquisition. From May 31, 201 to July 16, 2012, Defendant A prepared and submitted documents necessary for counseling and introduction of sojourn-related education institutes, and acquisition of status of stay after receiving the aforementioned consideration five times in total, as shown in the list of offenses (2) in the attached Table of Crimes (2), and prepared and submitted documents related to the acquisition of status of stay after receiving KRW 30,00,000 from H and I, who worked in G as set forth in No. 11 and No. 12 in the attached Table of Crimes (2).

Accordingly, even if the defendant is not a licensed administrative agent, the defendant provided consultation on administration, and provided services such as preparing documents and submitting agency.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Report of internal investigation (as to the analysis of evidentiary materials for seized articles), report of internal investigation (J and analysis of seized articles);