logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.11.01 2018고단1262
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 25, 2012, the criminal defendant against the victim C calls the victim C at a place where it is not known about March 15, 2012, and “The extent of 40 to 50 female employees, who are the president of the domestic entertainment shop and the president of the local entertainment shop.”

In order to lend money to D workers at high interest rate and to pay interest after one year.

“The phrase was false.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not run an entertainment store and did not want to pay money to the victim even if he borrowed money from the victim because he did not want to use the money for personal use.

On March 26, 2012, the Defendant received five copies of one million won check from the injured party, which was issued on or around March 26, 2012, and received a total of KRW 32,00,000,000 over three occasions, as shown in attached Table 1.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On June 10, 2013, the Defendant against the victim E made a false statement to the effect that “The victim was put on auction of the victim’s 30-40 commercial buildings located in Cheongju-si H, J commercial buildings located in I, and the building located in the ju-si, and that the above building would be repaid if it was lent 12 million won.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have been awarded a bid for the above buildings, and was thought to have used the above buildings individually from the injured party, so there was no intention or ability to repay the said buildings even if borrowed money to the injured

The Defendant received 12 million won from the injured party to the new bank account in the name of the Defendant’s husband K on the same day, and received 30,731,000 won in total over 10 times, as shown in the attached Table 2 of the List of Crimes.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol against C and E;

1. The certificate of borrowing;

arrow