A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than nine months.

The charge of violating the Labor Standards Act as to B among the facts charged in the instant case is acquitted.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On August 10, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for fraud to the Seoul Northern District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 28, 2017.

[2017 Highest 4300] The Defendant referred to as “a business that can only B,” to the victim C at an unsound place on March 2015, the Defendant returned to the victim C at a time not later than one month. In the event of an investment, the Defendant will return to the victim two times the month.”

4.1.Around January, 201, the victim received 2.5 million won from the victim to the corporate bank account in the name of the defendant.

After that, the defendant has suffered the same damage.

5. Around 29.29. Around the victim’s statement that “in the event of an additional investment, it would create KRW 10 million,” the victim received KRW 500,000 from the victim to the said account as an investment deposit.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to return twice the month.

Accordingly, the Defendant, as seen above, received a total of three million won from the victim by deceiving the victim.

[2017 Highest 5068] Around September 2012, the Defendant entered into an agreement with the D Foundation to produce and deliver sculptures E, and the victim F was a person in charge of the aforementioned D Foundation E-licing business.

On October 2012, the Defendant: (a) was delayed in the supply of the foregoing sculptures; (b) the victim, who is a business manager, is bound to cooperate with the Defendant for the implementation of the project; and (c) the victim said, “The investor was making an investment in obtaining the investment of the investment in the investment of the amount of money; (d) the FV first lent this money to G who is a manufacturer of the sculpture, and used this money for the production cost of the sampling of the above sculpture, and (e) the amount of money is returned to the investor.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, he did not deliver it to G, who is the manufacturer of sculptures, and was thought to use it in another place.

Nevertheless, it is not appropriate.