Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The victim C is a dentist who operates the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D building and the 'E dental department located in the fourth floor', and the defendant is a person who had been treated by the victim at the above hospital around September 2017.

In fact, the Defendant did not change the Defendant’s entrance to the so-called “satisfying” by the victim’s lapting procedure, or there was no change in the victim’s mouth structure, such as gring by the victim’s rashing procedure. However, around December 6, 2017, the Defendant is required to keep the victim’s rash in the place where many and unspecified players are satisfy in front of the above hospital around December 6, 2017, where “E dental surgery led to the death of the rapting satfy with the patient’s senshing to the normal ging of the patient’s death and disregarding the patient suffering from side effects.

Around 100 cm in width and about 120 cm in length as indicated in “,” the victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out false facts about the victim at a total of four times in the same place on December 8, 2017, around December 9, 2017 and around December 11, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to C;

1. Consent form of the skin's dynae procedure, photographic, photographic, and photographic before and after the procedure, etc. of one demonstration;

1. Screening pictures after the scambling process and after the scambling;

1. A copy of a set of fee for self-treatment;

1. The screen of the victim and the victim’s letter arrangement and closure [to the effect that the Defendant does not have a criminal intent of defamation, in light of the following: (a) the Defendant is sufficiently recognized as having a criminal intent of defamation or defamation in light of the evidence photographs and letters given and taken by the first person’s demonstration duly examined and duly adopted by this court; and (b) the Defendant may be sufficiently recognized as having committed a criminal intent of defamation.]

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article 307 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. The aggravated Criminal Act for concurrent crimes.