logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.10.23 2014고단1195
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 17, 2006, the Defendant was released from parole on April 30, 2012, when he was sentenced to seven years of imprisonment for robbery, injury, etc. in the Daejeon District Court’s astronomical Branch, and on April 30, 2012, the parole period expired on December 8, 2012.

1. On August 21, 2013, the fraud Defendant made a false statement to the victim C that “A victim C play an interest play by leaving KRW 1 billion received as a miscarriage to the lending company, and prior to October 10, 2013, the Defendant would recover KRW 300 million from the leased company.” If the Defendant borrowed KRW 50 million from the leased company, the Defendant would pay the recovered amount after deducting the amount from the recovered amount.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not leave money received from miscarriage or loan companies, and there was no property under the Defendant’s name, and there was no intent or ability to repay the money even if the Defendant borrowed the money from the victim, such as living as a worker at the time.

Nevertheless, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired a copy of the KRW 50 million check from the victim as the borrowed money on August 22, 2013.

2. On August 24, 2013, the Defendant, who attempted to commit fraud, called the victim C at an unsound place, and made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would receive KRW 1 billion from the lending company, and would provide the lending company with KRW 60 million,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,

However, in fact, the Defendant did not leave one billion won to the lending company, and there was no property under the name of the Defendant, and there was no intention or ability to repay the money even if the Defendant borrowed the money from the victim, such as living as a daily worker at the time.

Nevertheless, the defendant, as above, tried to deceiving the victim and to obtain money from the victim, but the victim is so.

arrow