The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (limited to eight months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and confiscation) is too unhued and unfair.

2. The act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and requires a good and serious punishment to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic business establishments, and to establish a sound sexual culture, while the defendant has been punished for the same kind of crime, etc., he/she again commits the crime of this case against the defendant.

However, in light of the following: (a) the Defendant’s time to commit the instant crime; (b) the period for committing the instant crime is not long; and (c) the period for committing the instant crime does not seem to increase and profit-making; and (d) the instant crime is in the concurrent relationship between the Defendant’s six months of imprisonment with prison labor in the Incheon District Court Branch Branch on October 24, 2014, which became final and conclusive on January 17, 2015 and the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act; (b) the equity with the case to be adjudicated simultaneously pursuant to Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act should be considered; and (c) other various sentencing conditions as well as the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age and behavior environment; and (d) the circumstances before

3. If so, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.