1. The Defendant’s KRW 39,347,586 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from August 15, 2014 to May 23, 2018, and the following.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a person working as the head of the office in the Defendant Union. Around 14:00 on August 14, 2014, the Plaintiff was able to take part in a knife with a knife that was driven by an office knife while getting off from the Defendant Union’s office.

B. Accordingly, the plaintiff caused the injury of the plaintiff to the heat in the anti-conceptist, the corrected body, the red-recepting room, the certificate of information infection, the censorship of bills and the escape of fluids.

[Grounds for recognition] The descriptions of evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. An employer is obligated to take necessary measures, such as improving the human and physical environment, so that an employee does not harm his/her life, body, or health in the course of providing his/her labor, and where an employee suffers damage by violating such duty of protection (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 97Da12082, Feb. 23, 199; 9Da47129, May 16, 2000). The Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damage caused by the instant accident, since the Defendant is negligent in having an external professional company responsible for the removal of a sloping site by having the Plaintiff, who is an employee who is an employee who is not at all related to the said work, perform the said work in a safe way through collaboration with the relevant fee, or removing other dangerous factors.

B. However, even though the plaintiff should have put dangerous blades into the knife house prior to his getting out of the knife, let the knife well look at the surrounding area, and caused the plaintiff's negligence to have caused the occurrence and expansion of damages caused by the accident of this case, it should be considered in calculating the amount of damages to be compensated by the defendant.