logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.06.10 2018가단5203787
대여금
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff KRW 63,00,206 and KRW 30,344,790 among them. From July 27, 2018, the Defendant shall pay to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. If the purport of the entire argument is added to the statement in the evidence No. 1 through No. 5 of the Plaintiff’s succeeding Intervenor’s claim, the Plaintiff entered into a loan transaction agreement with the Defendant on February 26, 2013, and loaned KRW 40 million to the Defendant on the same day, and the Defendant delayed to pay the principal and interest of loan from July 8, 2014, and the Plaintiff entered into a loan agreement with the Defendant on July 26, 2018 pursuant to the loan agreement and settled the principal and interest of KRW 63,00,206 (the principal and interest of KRW 30,34,790, KRW 4,577,750, late 2,941,200, late 25,136,466, after the termination of the lawsuit in this case, and the Plaintiff notified the Plaintiff and the Intervenor of the transfer of the principal and interest of loan between the Intervenor and the Intervenor on November 30, 2018.

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff's successor intervenor the above 63,00,206 won and 30,344,790 won with interest rate of 20.49% from July 27, 2018 to the date of full payment.

Plaintiff

The claim of the succeeding intervenor shall be quoted for the reasons.

2. If the purport of the entire argument is added to the statement in the evidence Nos. 4 and 5 of the Plaintiff’s claim part, the Plaintiff entered into an asset acquisition agreement with the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor on November 30, 2018 during the litigation of this case with the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor on November 30, 2018, on which the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor notified the Defendant of the transfer on December 24, 2018, and thus, the Plaintiff is no creditor against the Defendant.

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed for lack of reason.

arrow