A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a BM5 car.

On November 19, 2012, the Defendant driven the said car at a speed of about 50 km from November 11:5, 2012, while driving the said car, and driving it at a speed of about 0.191% of alcohol concentration in the blood, and driving it at a speed of about 50 km per hour at a speed of about one-lane of two-lane roads from the breath to the breath of the territorial sea.

In the event that a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle is unable to drive a motor vehicle normally due to alcohol, he/she shall not drive the motor vehicle, and when changing the lane, he/she has a duty of care to prevent accidents, such as operating direction, etc., giving prior notice of change of course, and changing the lane after well examining the traffic conditions of the front and rear left, etc.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting this and changing the course from a two-lane to a two-lane, and the Defendant did not discover a Dives vehicle driven by the victim C(the age of 32) who is straight along the same direction two lanes, and did not find any such Dives vehicle as driven by the victim C(the age of 32). The Defendant shocked into the left part of the said SM5 vehicle driven by the Defendant at the right end of the PM5 vehicle, which is driven by the victim E(the age of 44) driving in the same direction, with the left part of the PM5 vehicle driven by the victim E(the age of 44).

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the victim C’s tension and tension in need of approximately two weeks’ medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence, and suffered the victim E from the left-hand sponsed spons, the left-hand spons, and the left-hand sponsed spons, the left-hand spons, and the above sponsed car amounting to KRW 400,000, 489,900, without taking necessary measures, such as immediately stopping the said sponsor or car and aiding the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1..