The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable as the lower court’s punishment (a0 million won of fine) is too unhued.

2. The Korean Criminal Procedure Act, which takes the trial-oriented principle and the principle of directness, has a unique area for sentencing determination, and there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court, and the first instance court’s sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). In this case, in full view of the following: (a) there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions compared to the original judgment; (b) the circumstance and circumstances of a drunk driving; (c) the degree of blood alcohol concentration; (d) the distance of a drunk driving; and (e) no criminal record other than a fine once due to a drunk driving; (b) the company should retire when a sentence is sentenced to imprisonment without prison labor or heavier; (c) the traffic safety education is completed and the traffic safety education is conducted and the victim is not required to repeat a crime after obtaining alcohol addiction consultation; and (d) all the sentencing conditions and sentencing conditions indicated in the arguments and records of the instant case, including the Defendant’s age and happiness environment, it is not recognized that the

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.