1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, KRW 3,743,138 against the Plaintiff and its related thereto, from September 3, 2014 to March 18, 2015.

1. Basic facts

A. On September 3, 2011, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a purchase agreement with the following terms (hereinafter “instant purchase agreement”).

A: Defendant (Buyer) C: The Plaintiff (producer) C and B shall be purchased under the following terms and conditions of the contract:

1) The unit price shall be determined in consultation with A and B, and the cost (80%) after the determination shall be paid to C by credit and the difference shall be paid in cash 45 days after the date of entry (customs clearance) to B. (5 days following the date of payment) 20% shall be deposited into the account of B or into the account designated by B. (3) due to the delay of the date of shipment.

4) The payment period shall be determined after consultation with Gap and Eul, and the amount of payment shall also be extended to 30 days if the delay in the payment period causes interference to Gap's sales (total 75 days). 5) Open Credit shall be open after consultation with Eul and Eul.

(6) The defective goods entered into the Republic of Korea shall be returned to the producer and repaired during the period of repair (Provided, That the cost of repair in the Republic of Korea shall be borne by the producer.

8) 8) Eul manufactures only the (domestic) suitability raw materials after the testing of raw materials or subsidiary materials samples, and puts test samples to Gap.

(name of A). In the event of an inappropriate finished product, return shall be made in the absence of such finished product.

(11) All contracts, orders, or other documents shall be sent by e-mail or facsimile, and the appearance thereof shall not be recognized. (2) The Plaintiff is the Defendant, a Chinese company, QINAH UNFINERY CO. LTD. (hereinafter “e-mail”) (hereinafter “e-mail”).

) The clothing of 16,789 points produced by it (hereinafter referred to as “instant clothing”) is referred to as “the instant clothing”;

(C) The Defendant’s representative director D substantially operated the Defendant, and the conclusion of the instant purchase contract and the subsequent services were also carried out by B. 【The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, Party A, and Party B.