logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.03.29 2016고단1484
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for 10 months, Defendant B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for 6 months, respectively.

However, the defendant C is subject to objection.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the actual representative of the manufacturer and seller of electrical and electronic equipment in Gwangju Mine-gu, and Defendant B is the person in charge of raising funds necessary for the operation of the above company as the branch of the above Party A and Defendant C as the branch of the above Party B.

The Defendants, while running the above company together, had the intent to acquire the investment money from the investors by exaggerationing the operational status of the above company.

Defendant

C around the end of January 27, 2013, to K (the wife of the victim L) who is located in J Indodon located in J Indon located in I at the end of the end of the month, “four persons, including B, shall be listed on the KOSDAQ, and four persons, including B, shall have 25% of each equity interest. If 100 million won is invested in the project expenses, it may receive monthly pay at the factory for 2 to 3 days. On the other hand, two million won per month and five million won per month if a new factory is being constructed and currently being promoted,” and the Defendants have re-verificationd the above contents at H office located in M around January 27, 2014, and “The representative director has not been supplied due to a large amount of order at the present time,” and Defendant C’s written confirmation in the above name of the victim, and the following documents were written by the victim.”

However, in fact, Defendant C did not have at all the shares of the above company, and did not have a large volume of orders to the extent that it could not produce. At the time, the above company did not have capital and did not have to purchase materials, and it was difficult to operate because there was little lack of sales and there was a lack of personnel to continue to do so. Therefore, even if the Defendants received money from the injured party, they did not have the intent or ability to pay the victim two million won or five million

Nevertheless, the Defendants deceiving the victim as above and around January 27, 2014.

arrow