Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 23, 2016, the Defendant of defamation by statement of fact: (a) Non-cheon City building C, which is a building through which many unspecified persons pass, and (b) D with respect to “A person who suffers damage at the entrance of the first floor and the fourth floor”, “A person who has employed a tin seat tag and has committed violence to an extent to which a medical certificate would be raised.

The poster “ has been posted once.”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the honor of victims by openly pointing out facts.

2. On September 16, 2016, the Defendant’s defamation of false facts posted a poster stating that “The owner is acting in bad faith with the third lessee occupying the third lessee for the purpose of eating the right of retention,” which read, “The owner is acting in bad faith for the purpose of eating the right of retention,” which read, “The owner is acting in bad faith with the third lessee occupying the third lessee for the purpose of eating the right of retention,” which read, “The owner is acting in possession of the third lessee for the purpose of eating the right of retention.”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the honor of victims by openly pointing out false facts.

3. At around September 2015, the Defendant: (a) posted a letter as described in paragraphs 1 and 2, on the ground that the victims’ right of retention is not recognized in the above building where the victim D or E operates a building leasing business; (b) on the ground that the victims do not recognize the Defendant’s right of retention; (c) on the ground that the Defendant was removed from the Defendant’s possessor around September 2015, the Defendant lost possession; and (d) posted a letter as described in paragraphs 1 and 2, even if the Defendant was not the Defendant’s right of retention due to the extinguishment of the Defendant’s possession; and (e) against the unspecified lessees located therein, the Defendant legally liable

As such, the purport of this building’s “Nara” was notified of false facts.

By spreading false facts, the Defendant interfered with the work of leasing the victims' buildings.

Summary of Evidence

1..