(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.07.04 2013고단7815

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.07.04 2013고단7815

사기

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 27, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to four years of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 10, 2014.

The Defendant is a New Zealand Real Estate Investment Company C and D, a New Zealand Real Estate Investment Company, and a person operating a corporation E, a Korean corporation, etc.

On May 2007, the Defendant concluded a contract for the sale of other canal 1 with the victim F to the effect that “If the market price of 2,500,000 won for other canal ices, which is currently being developed in New Zealand, would be 1,30,000 won, it would be allowed to purchase other canal ices, monthly salary of 4,00,000 won for local affiliate companies, and would be employed by the class of directors.” The Defendant recommended the victim to visit New Zealand to show the scene of the site and explain the project that shows stability and profitability, thereby enabling the victim to believe the Defendant’s horse more, the Defendant concluded a contract for the sale of the sales of the contract for the other canal 1 with the victim.

However, the GTP development project is a business that constructs a housing site and constructs a new house with a PF loan from a financial institution. Since the two years have passed since the project was conducted, H, a land seller, did not complete the civil engineering work and most of other buyers have not been secured. Of the land subject to the project, only the ownership was secured for 1st page and the ownership was not secured for 2st page, and it is difficult to normally carry out the project with the PF loan from a financial institution due to the fact that it is difficult for the victim to receive the PF loan from the financial institution due to the fact that it was difficult for the victim to normally carry out the project due to the fact that it was difficult for the victim to receive the money from the victim, it did not have any intention or ability to allow the victim to acquire the ownership by constructing a

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and then is down payment around July 6, 2007 from the victim.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2013.09.27 2013고단1570

-서울남부지방법원 2016.09.20 2016가단4031

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.02.13 2014노2666

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.01.24 2013노3482

-서울고등법원 2014.11.27 2014나13664