logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2021.03.11 2020고단6605
재물손괴등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and a fine for 200,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 25, 2020, around 21:43, the Defendant damaged the entrance of the “D” restaurant operated by the victim C, Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, on the ground that the entrance was temporarily set up, and the fires located on the entrance and the side of the entrance were removed several times, and thus, damaged it by plucking, plucking, digging up, and cutting down, the victim, who was the victim of the tea.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the date, time, and place specified in paragraph 1, the police officer F of the Seoul Western Police Station E District, the police officer of the Seoul Gangnam Police Station who was dispatched upon receipt of a report 112, and G in order to require the Defendant to present his identification card, and hear the circumstances of the case.

“At the same time, G was pushed down a part of G at the same time, and was pushed down two fingers of G’s chests which restrain it.

As above, Defendant assaulted police officers and obstructed their legitimate execution of duties regarding the handling of 112 reports.

3. The Defendant for violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act was arrested on November 25, 202, within the E District District of Seoul Gangseo-gu Seoul Police Station E District on H on November 25, 2020, and on the same ground as the description in paragraph 2, and was under the influence of alcohol, “Seba, Haba, Haba” while under the influence of alcohol;

Far Madar Madar, Hadar Madar Madar Madar

“A sound,” such as “A sound, was sounded by a large voice for about one hour.”

The Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, had a very rough and disorderly speech and behavior at a public office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. C’s statement;

1. Investigation report (Attachment of screen pictures submitted by police officers) - above video CDs, investigative reports (Attachment of photographs related to damage to property) - Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of photographics;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 366 of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment (the point of destruction of property, the choice of imprisonment), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties in the judgment, the choice of imprisonment), Article 3(3)1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of cancellation of government offices in the judgment, and the selection of fines).

arrow