logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2014.05.23 2014고단202
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 31, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment for the crime of injury at the Daegu District Court on April 12, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence in the two prisons in the Gyeonggi Northern District Court.

[2014 Highest 202]

1. On January 18, 2014, around 00:00, the Defendant got off the victim E (the age of 43) (a police officer) who was working in the D District D Zone in Seoposi-si, Seopoposi, Seopoposi, the Defendant Hapo-si, saying, “Before being treated unfairly by one team of the D District Zone 1, the police officer was dratized.” On the other hand, the Defendant flicked the F, who was being transferred to the said District dratated, followed the Defendant to go out of the dratum site of the said District Office.

The defendant, who is dissatisfied with the complaint, stated that the victim "the same flap is not a problem even in many cases," and had the victim go beyond the victim in the future by breathing the flap of the victim by double hand.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of the victim's situation service, and at the same time, the victim failed to observe the right-free knee, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. On February 12, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 18:20 on February 12, 2014, the Defendant committed an obstruction of performance of official duties to the police officer G of the Western Police Station, who was working at the D District Office of the relevant Western Police Station, with the “pine he has received a written statement.” On the other hand, the Defendant saw the police officer who had worked at the same place with his humiliation and sound, and caused his behavior.

Accordingly, G solicited the defendant to go out of others, and the defendant, who is dissatisfied with G's bridge, was assaulted by plucking, plucking, etc. of G's left hand 4th hand to restrain it.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers.

3. Interference with business;

A. On January 8, 2014, the Defendant, who interfered with the business of the Victim H, is different from the Defendant in the J K practice room operated by the Victim H in Seopo-si, Seopo-si.

arrow