logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.01.11 2017고단6223
절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 26, 2017, the Defendant, at around 18:50, placed the victim C’s surveillance room in Suwon-si B, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant: (a) placed the victim’s victim C, who was displayed in the display stand using a gap in which surveillance was neglected; and (b) cut off the victim’s 148,000 won at the market price, which was the victim’s possession.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the defendant's legal statement C and written statements to each investigation report (the counter investigation of the victim, the analysis of CCTV images at the scene of a crime, the name of the suspect, specific suspect, and the process of arrest);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence of the Criminal Act (the following reasons for sentencing) / [the scope of recommendation / [the scope of punishment ] the basic area (from April to August) of Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (the conditions favorable to the defendant among the reasons for sentencing / [the scope of recommendation / the basic area (the theft of neglect, etc.) for general property / [the sentencing range] of comparison between the sentences and the recommended sentencing range: April to August / 8 [the sentence] unfavorable to the defendant: The sentence is name seven times including the previous conviction and the suspended sentence two times, which are favorable to the defendant. The extent of damage is minor. The fact that the error is recognized and seriously reflects the conditions for sentencing prescribed in Article 51

arrow