logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 (창원) 2018.04.19 2017나23908
징계처분무효확인
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding and adding the following, thereby citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff and the defendant are not significantly different from the allegations in the first instance court, and the fact-finding and determination in the first instance court are recognized as legitimate in full view of all the additional arguments and evidence added by this court). The 10th 2th 10th 2th 10th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 10

On December 27, 2013, the first instance court’s six pages, “The filing of an employee’s invention report to the Defendant late later,” added “(the above employee’s invention report contains only the Plaintiff (80%) and E (20%) as an employee’s employee and no reference is made with respect to F).”

In the 7th instance judgment of the first instance court, the Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit, and the period of prescription is suspended for the period of audit (from November 16, 2015 to January 20, 2016) pursuant to Article 19 of the Defendant’s internal audit regulations, and the salary reduction disposition of this case was conducted two years in the period of prescription and 66 days in the period of grace period under the personnel regulations at the time of the completion of the above registration and enrollment, as seen earlier.) is added to “The period of prescription for the instant salary reduction disposition, even if the period of prescription expires during which the Plaintiff submitted the employee invention report at the latest.”

The 8th judgment of the first instance court is 3rd 'the abuse of discretionary power' as ‘the deviation and abuse of discretionary power'.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, and all appeals by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

arrow