logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.07.14 2016고정1011
국토의계획및이용에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the owner of land (such as the previous one, the previous one), approximately 1,310 square meters in Han-si, Suwon-si B, C, and D.

In accordance with the relevant statutes, such as the National Land Planning and Utilization Act, a person who intends to engage in development activities on land shall obtain permission from the head of Si/Gun, but the defendant constructed a retaining wall, which is a structure, without obtaining permission from the head of Si/Gun on October 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to accusation documents by the head of Jongno-si;

1. Relevant Article 140 of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act and Articles 140 subparagraph 1 and 56 (1) 1 of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the head of Si/Gun/Gu has lodged an accusation against the Defendant on the ground that the Defendant was installing a retaining wall and a retaining wall on the entire area of three lots of land owned by the Defendant without permission. The criminal facts of this case constitute the part where the Defendant installed the retaining wall without permission. The Defendant applied for permission to engage in development activities around April 5, 2016, which was the part of the entire land area, after the prosecution of this case, and applied for permission to engage in development activities around May 19, 2016. The head of Si/Ma-si District B and 871 square meters (former, field) among C, for raising earth and structure for farming and building structures, and the circumstances and results of each order of this case, such as the fact that the Defendant obtained permission to fill up the ground and building structures for Class 1 265 square meters (former, field) among D.

arrow