1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

As the Plaintiff completed the construction by subcontracting in the amount of KRW 50,00,000 among the renovation and repair works on the instant real estate, the Plaintiff sought confirmation that there exists a lien on the instant real estate by setting the aforementioned construction cost claim as the preserved right.

It is insufficient to acknowledge the existence of the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendant and the fact that the Plaintiff possessed the real estate of this case, solely on the basis of the descriptions of Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including the number of branch numbers), and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.