The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On August 15, 2016, around 02:30 on August 15, 2016, the Defendant: (a) reported that the victim E (hereinafter “D”) who is a customer in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, was in front of the calculation unit to calculate after meals; and (b) followed the victim; and (c) as the Defendant’s son’s son’s son’s son was made available one time as much as his her son’s son was used.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the CCTV image of this case, the Defendant was guilty of indecent act against the Defendant at the time, in light of the following: (a) the Defendant was her body contact during a short period of time (less than 1 seconds) while the Defendant was using a little narrow space behind the victim’s body; and (b) the hand, etc. coming to the right side of the victim, going to the right side of the victim, is deemed to have come to contact with the victim’s right side (the victim’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her part, not

It is difficult to see it.

The evidence submitted by the prosecutor, such as the victim's statement by the police, etc., alone, that the defendant committed an act identical to that stated in the facts charged with the intention of prosecution.

There is insufficient evidence to acknowledge it and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, a judgment of not guilty is rendered in accordance with the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.