logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.11.02 2017고단3585
가정폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 2, 2017, the Defendant received a provisional protective order stating that he/she will enter the Daegu Middle-gu Apartment Complex C, 103 Dong 1004, which is the residence of the wife B, from the due court until the victim protective order is determined.

1. The Defendant, who committed the crime of May 13, 2017, entered the wife B’s residence on the ground that around 19:05 around May 13, 2017, he brought about a drug in the above place.

Accordingly, the defendant did not comply with an ad hoc protection order.

2. The Defendant, who committed the crime of May 19, 2017, entered the residence of the wife B on the ground that his body is difficult due to his old-age living around 01:00 on May 19, 2017.

Accordingly, the defendant did not comply with an ad hoc protection order.

3. The Defendant, on June 5, 2017, entered the residence of the wife B on the ground that around 22:44 around June 5, 2017, the Defendant brought a charge, etc. at the above location.

Accordingly, the defendant did not comply with an ad hoc protection order.

The Defendant, on July 18, 2017, at the 'E' restaurant located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, on July 15, 2017, the Defendant had a peace sense.

F Assaultd by assaulting F on the ground that F was a man and a woman of another male, and the police station G police box sent out upon receipt of a report, and she saw F from H to the police officer affiliated with the police station, and expressed that “I see, she would be unable to see this, she would fright, she would be off, and she was assaulted, such as tightly fright the chest’s chest with the hand floor, she was pushed up with the head, she was fright up with the head, she was fright up with the head, and fright up with the head.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the handling of reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 3585"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to B;

1. Copy of the provisional protection order;

1. Four copies of photographic pictures in the victim's residence; 4. 2017 Height 4611;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and H;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

arrow