1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Plaintiff regarding confirmation of invalidity of the disposition rejecting reappointment as of February 17, 2014 shall be revoked.

Basic Facts

The court's explanation on this part is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case where "disposition 3" of No. 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance is changed to "disposition 3 refusing re-election of this case", and therefore, it is identical to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it

Plaintiff’s assertion

Article 53-2(7) of the Private School Act and Article 53-2(7) of the Private School Act of the defendant's violation of the defendant's school regulations provide that "in deliberating on whether a teacher's personnel committee is reappointed to a teacher, it shall be based on objective grounds prescribed by school regulations, such as education for students, academic research, evaluation of matters concerning guidance for students, etc." This provision is a mandatory provision. The defendant, in the second disposition, shall publish one thesis on the candidates in the school regulations [in the case of a candidate for a school career within one year, the average of the evaluation scores in the year 1, 2013 and the class evaluation scores in the year 1, 2013 shall be within 40 of the full-time professor subject to evaluation; hereinafter referred to as "the terms of this case"], and then arbitrarily determine whether a teacher's personnel committee did not meet such requirements.

Therefore, the disposition rejecting the reappointment of this case is null and void in violation of Article 53-2(7) of the Private School Act.

Article 53-2 (6) of the Private School Act in violation of Article 53-2 (6) of the Private School Act provides that "the person who has the right to appoint and dismiss an application for deliberation on reappointment under paragraph (5) shall decide whether to re-appoint the relevant teacher after deliberation on reappointment by the teachers' personnel committee under Article 53-3 and notify the relevant teacher of such decision not later than two months before the expiration of the term of appointment. In this case, when the relevant teacher decides not to re-appoint the relevant teacher, he/she shall clearly state

However, on January 23, 2014, the Plaintiff from the Defendant.